Dr. Steven Greer Interview With Carol Rosin | The Atacama Coverup PART 3/4

D
Dr. Steven Greer
·
April 5, 2018
46.1K views
Tier 2Research and IntelligenceResearch & Analysis

Analysis Summary

Program Intel Profile
interviewTopic: otherIntel Value: 8/10

Summary

The person discussing the Atacama humanoid is a medical doctor and scientist. They analyzed the bone density of the specimen, which was thought to be a fetus. The doctor explained that the bone density was similar to that of a six to eight-year-old child, not a fetus. They criticized a scientific paper that claimed the specimen was a deformed fetus, arguing it was based on flawed data and lacked proper controls. The doctor expressed concern over the peer review process and the media's role in spreading misinformation. After the encounter, the doctor felt a strong need for a federal investigation into the research and called for more transparency in scientific reporting.

✦ AI Generated

Program Intelligence Analysis

Executive Summary

The discussion centers on the Atacama humanoid, asserting that its bone density suggests it is not a fetus but a child. Concerns are raised about the integrity of the peer review process for a related genome research paper, suggesting a breakdown in scientific oversight and potential cover-up. The speaker calls for further investigation into the claims and methodologies used in the research.

Primary Revelation

The Atacama humanoid has bone density consistent with a six to eight year old child, not a fetus.

D
Dr. Lachman
scientistpro disclosure
Stanford University
renowned expert in skeletal abnormalitieswrote the textbook on skeletal abnormalities

There is absolutely no way this is a fetus that was aborted or a miscarry.

D
Dr. Nolan
scientistunknown
Stanford University
competent scientistinvolved in the research

This is a trick, this is pulling a rabbit out of a black hat.

M
Matthew Worman
scientistneutral
Boston Children's HospitalHarvard
expert on skeletal genetic disorders

I would be very cautious to use any of the data presented in this paper to draw any conclusions.

Atacama Humanoid Studymodern (2012)disputed

Managed by: Stanford University

investigate the origins and classification of the Atacama humanoid

biologicsspecific
+2 Corroborators

The Atacama humanoid has bone density consistent with a six to eight year old child, not a fetus.

Source: Unnamed individual
scientificspecific
+2 Corroborators

The peer review process for the genome research paper on the Atacama humanoid was flawed and lacked transparency.

Source: Unnamed individual
scientificspecific
+2 Corroborators

There is a significant breakdown in the scientific oversight and peer review process at Stanford University and Genome Research.

Source: Unnamed individual
scientificspecific
+1 Corroborators

The conclusions drawn in the genome research paper regarding the Atacama humanoid are based on cherry-picked data.

Source: Unnamed individual
coverupvague
+2 Corroborators

There is a potential cover-up regarding the true nature of the Atacama humanoid and its origins.

Source: Unnamed individual
✦ AI-extracted program intelligence — verify against source testimony

Analysis Summary

Program Intel Profile
interviewTopic: otherIntel Value: 8/10