Your Government Has Information On UFOs - Not Yet Made Public
Analysis Summary
Summary
The person discussing the UAP encounter is involved in the OSAP program. They talk about the investigation of the Tic Tac case, led by Jay Stratton, who wrote the initial report in 2018. This report was based on interviews with aviators and became part of a larger, unpublished report. They mention 38 defense intelligence reference documents created for OSAP, which aimed to establish a baseline for science and technology related to UAPs. The person notes that the defense industry valued these reports, despite public skepticism. They emphasize that many classified details support the pilots' experiences and that there is significant information not available to the public due to national security. The encounter has led to ongoing discussions about the credibility of military personnel and the complexity of UAP analysis.
Program Intelligence Analysis
The video discusses the OSAP program's investigation into the Tic Tac incident, highlighting Jay Stratton's role in preparing reports and analyzing UFO cases. It emphasizes the importance of classified information in understanding these phenomena and critiques public skepticism towards military assessments.
Jay Stratton prepared 38 Defense Intelligence Reference Documents (DIRDs) for the OSAP program to establish a baseline for science and technology.
Jay Stratton
“We had more information and so when you say oh it's just a video, it's not.”
Managed by: Department of Defense
Investigate UAP cases and establish technological baselines
The first case OSAP investigated was the Tic Tac incident, and Jay Stratton was the primary author of the initial report.
Jay Stratton prepared 38 Defense Intelligence Reference Documents (DIRDs) for the OSAP program to establish a baseline for science and technology.
The DIRDs were well-received by the defense industry as they provided a necessary baseline for analyzing UFO cases.
Jay Stratton indicated that if an object was identifiable or known, it would not be included in his analysis.
Jay Stratton stated that there is much information related to key cases that cannot be shared with the public for national security reasons.