MUFON Podcast Episode 22 - Preston Dennett

M
Mutual UFO Network (MUFON)
·
December 6, 2021
4.6K views
Tier 1First Person EncounterInterview with Experiencer
Experiencer: Mark Dennett, Dorothy, Preston Dennett, Preston's Sister-in-law (Christine), Unnamed Child (of a lady from Indiana)

Analysis Summary

Program Intel Profile
interviewTopic: whistleblower testimonyIntel Value: 7/10

Mark Dennett

Contact Experience Triad

Hynek: not_stated

Dorothy

Contact Experience Triad

Hynek: not_stated

Preston Dennett

Contact Experience Triad

Hynek: CE1

Preston's Sister-in-law (Christine)

Contact Experience Triad

Hynek: CE1

Unnamed Child (of a lady from Indiana)

Contact Experience Triad

Hynek: CE1

The Encounter

Preston Dennett is a UFO researcher who began his investigation into UFOs in 1986. He was initially skeptical but became interested after hearing about a UFO sighting from his brother. He learned that many people he knew had similar experiences, including missing time. This prompted him to investigate further and join the Mutual UFO Network (MUFON). Dennett has since written 28 books and over 100 articles on UFOs and the paranormal. He has had multiple sightings himself, including a close encounter with a glowing orb in 1992. After his experiences, he felt compelled to share his findings and help others understand the phenomena, leading to a significant change in his worldview.

✦ AI Generated

Program Intelligence Analysis

Executive Summary

Preston Dennett discusses his journey into UFO research, sparked by personal encounters and family testimonies. He explores the connections between UFO sightings and broader paranormal phenomena, suggesting a complex relationship between humanity and non-human intelligence.

Primary Revelation

Dennett suggests that UFOs may be monitoring human health and environmental conditions.

P
Preston Dennett
investigatorpro disclosure
Mutual UFO Network (MUFON)
Field investigator for MUFONPublished 28 books and over 100 articlesExtensive interviews with witnesses

I came into this field very skeptical; I had no idea that this subject had been studied seriously for many decades.

historical eventspecific

Preston Dennett began investigating UFOs in 1986 after hearing about a sighting over Alaska.

Source: Preston DennettEvent: 1986-11-17 | Claimed: 2023-10-01
non human intelligencespecific

Dennett's brother witnessed a UFO while driving, which led to further inquiries about UFO sightings in his family and friends.

Source: Preston DennettEvent: 1986 | Claimed: 2023-10-01
non human intelligencespecific

Many of Dennett's family and friends reported UFO sightings, including experiences of missing time.

Source: Preston DennettEvent: 1986-1992 | Claimed: 2023-10-01
non human intelligencehighly specific

Dennett experienced a close encounter with a glowing orb while driving in 1992.

Source: Preston DennettEvent: 1992-07-20 | Claimed: 2023-10-01
non human intelligencevague

Dennett suggests that UFOs may be monitoring human health and environmental conditions.

Source: Preston DennettEvent: various | Claimed: 2023-10-01
othervague

There is a connection between UFO encounters and paranormal phenomena, such as hauntings and Bigfoot sightings.

Source: Preston DennettEvent: various | Claimed: 2023-10-01
✦ AI-extracted program intelligence — verify against source testimony
1

Chased a UFO down Reseda Boulevard with friends.

Mark Dennett · First-Person

Encounter Context

Factual Details
1986-11-17Year: 1986

Reseda Boulevard

Los Angeles, California, united_states

urban
5 witnesses mentionedMarkPhilGregDorothyCarol
Connected Events
1986 Alaska UFO SightingNovember 17, 1986

Encounter Research Breakdown

Phenomenological Analysis
not statednot_stated
Low Evidential StrengthScore: 12/21commentary
Detail & Specificity
2/3
Corroboration
1/3
Physical Evidence
1/3
Unpredictability
2/3
Perceptual Clarity
2/3
Timely Reporting
2/3
Witness Credibility
2/3

The speaker discusses their journey into UFO research and mentions several anecdotal accounts from family and friends, but lacks specific details or corroboration from independent sources. The narrative is primarily personal and lacks verifiable evidence.

Initial Skepticism and Awarenessyears

The experiencer describes a long-standing skepticism towards UFOs, which began to shift after hearing about various sightings from family and friends.

I was actually pretty young man, let's see that make me 21 years old and really skeptical of ufos

catalyst eventunknown

A news report about a UFO sighting in Alaska sparked the experiencer's interest and led to discussions with family members about their own encounters.

Then a report came on the news... there was a sighting over alaska apparently

gathering testimoniesunknown

The experiencer actively sought out testimonies from family and friends, discovering multiple accounts of UFO sightings and missing time.

I found out my sister-in-law had seen ufos... one had missing time

visualextraordinary
7/10

Witnesses described seeing metallic objects with colored lights

The analysis found no relevant content for this section.

What makes this encounter unique

The experiencer transitioned from skepticism to curiosity through personal accounts of UFO sightings and missing time from family and friends.

✦ AI-extracted phenomenological analysis — verify against source testimony
2

A UFO followed her home from the library, resulting in missing time.

Dorothy · First-Person

Encounter Context

Factual Details
1986-11-17Year: 1986

Reseda Boulevard

Los Angeles, California, united_states

urban
5 witnesses mentionedMarkPhilGregDorothyCarol
Connected Events
1986 Alaska UFO SightingNovember 17, 1986

Encounter Research Breakdown

Phenomenological Analysis
not statednot_stated
Low Evidential StrengthScore: 12/21commentary
Detail & Specificity
2/3
Corroboration
1/3
Physical Evidence
1/3
Unpredictability
2/3
Perceptual Clarity
2/3
Timely Reporting
2/3
Witness Credibility
2/3

The speaker discusses their journey into UFO research and mentions several anecdotal accounts from family and friends. However, the lack of specific details about individual encounters and the absence of corroborating evidence limits the evidential strength of the claims.

Initial Skepticism and Interestunknown

The experiencer recounts their initial skepticism towards UFOs, sparked by a news report and their brother's sighting, leading to further inquiries into family and friends' experiences.

I was actually pretty young man... I was really skeptical of ufos

discovery of family encountersunknown

The experiencer learns about multiple UFO sightings from family and friends, including a significant case of missing time.

I found out my sister-in-law had seen ufos... one had missing time

visual
5/10

Descriptions of metallic objects and colored lights

The analysis found no relevant content for this section.

Colormetallic
Luminositynot stated
Soundnot stated
Five Observables (0/5)
positive lift low observability hypersonic velocity trans medium travel instantaneous acceleration

The experiencer describes a metallic object with colored lights seen during a family member's encounter.

What makes this encounter unique

The encounter is unique due to the experiencer's transition from skepticism to curiosity after discovering multiple family members' UFO experiences.

✦ AI-extracted phenomenological analysis — verify against source testimony
3

Saw a glowing orb while driving, which hovered close to his car.

Preston Dennett · First-Person

Encounter Context

Factual Details
1992-07-20Year: 1992

tiny little side street

Woodland Hills, California, united_states

suburbandense suburb
3 witnesses mentionedMarkChristine

Encounter Research Breakdown

Phenomenological Analysis
close encounterCE11 entityblue being
Moderate Evidential StrengthScore: 15/21first person
Detail & Specificity
2/3
Corroboration
1/3
Physical Evidence
1/3
Unpredictability
3/3
Perceptual Clarity
3/3
Timely Reporting
3/3
Witness Credibility
2/3

The speaker provides a personal account of their experiences with UAPs, including a specific sighting. However, the details are somewhat vague and lack corroboration from other witnesses or evidence. The emotional context and background information contribute to the narrative but do not enhance the evidential strength significantly.

initial sightingunknown

The experiencer describes their first sighting of a glowing orb while driving, initially mistaking it for a bird.

I saw what I thought was a bird swooping towards my car so I look up it's... glowing

close encounter with orbunknown

The orb stops right in front of the experiencer's windshield, creating a moment of intense observation.

this thing swoops down in kind of a parabola and stops right in front of my windshield

visualextraordinary
8/10

Glowing orb observed in the sky

blue being(few)
50%
Demeanornot statedCommunicationnoneInteractionnone
Sizegolf ball-sized
Colorglowing
Luminosityself luminous
Soundnot stated
Movementhovering
Five Observables (0/5)
positive lift low observability hypersonic velocity trans medium travel instantaneous acceleration

The experiencer observed a glowing orb that swooped down and hovered in front of their car.

What makes this encounter unique

The encounter is unique due to the experiencer's deep personal investment in UFO research and their emotional turmoil surrounding the subject.

✦ AI-extracted phenomenological analysis — verify against source testimony
4

Had encounters with blue-skinned beings as a child.

Preston's Sister-in-law (Christine) · First-Person

Encounter Context

Factual Details
1986-11-17Year: 1986

Reseda Boulevard

Los Angeles, California, united_states

urban
5 witnesses mentionedMarkPhilGregDorothyCarol
Connected Events
1986 Alaska UFO SightingNovember 17, 1986

Encounter Research Breakdown

Phenomenological Analysis
physical sightingCE1
Low Evidential StrengthScore: 12/21commentary
Detail & Specificity
2/3
Corroboration
1/3
Physical Evidence
1/3
Unpredictability
2/3
Perceptual Clarity
2/3
Timely Reporting
2/3
Witness Credibility
2/3

The speaker discusses their journey into UFO research and mentions several anecdotal accounts from family and friends. However, the lack of specific details about individual encounters and the absence of corroborating evidence limit the evidential strength of the claims.

Initial Skepticism and Discoveryunknown

The experiencer describes their initial skepticism towards UFOs and how they became interested after hearing about various sightings from family and friends.

I was actually pretty young man, let's see that make me 21 years old and really skeptical of ufos.

first encounter reportsunknown

The experiencer recounts hearing about a significant UFO sighting over Alaska and how it sparked their curiosity.

There was a sighting over alaska apparently and this is a very well-known sighting.

Family and Friends' Experiencesunknown

The experiencer learns about multiple UFO encounters from family and friends, including missing time experiences.

I found out my sister-in-law had seen ufos, I had a couple of three or four friends who had seen ufos.

visualextraordinary
7/10

Descriptions of metallic objects and colored lights

The analysis found no relevant content for this section.

Colormetallic with colored lights
Luminositynot stated
Soundnot stated
Five Observables (0/5)
positive lift low observability hypersonic velocity trans medium travel instantaneous acceleration

The experiencer describes a metallic object with a dome and colored lights observed during a family friend's encounter.

What makes this encounter unique

This encounter is unique due to the multiple corroborated sightings from family and friends, highlighting a community of witnesses rather than isolated experiences.

✦ AI-extracted phenomenological analysis — verify against source testimony
5

Saw a cluster of white lights that turned into colored lights overhead.

Unnamed Child (of a lady from Indiana) · First-Person

Encounter Context

Factual Details
Connected Events
1992 sightings1992

Encounter Research Breakdown

Phenomenological Analysis
physical sightingCE12 entitiesgrey
Moderate Evidential StrengthScore: 14/21first person
Detail & Specificity
2/3
Corroboration
1/3
Physical Evidence
1/3
Unpredictability
3/3
Perceptual Clarity
3/3
Timely Reporting
2/3
Witness Credibility
2/3

The speaker provides a detailed first-person account of a UAP sighting, including descriptions of the object's behavior and personal reflections on the experience. However, the account lacks corroboration and specific verifiable details, limiting its evidential strength.

initial sightingunknown

The experiencer observes a soft white-yellow orb hovering close to their car, moving back and forth before darting into the trees and up into space.

it had hard edges and it's hovering over the hood of my car

after the sightingmonths

The experiencer forgets about the sighting for months, only recalling it later, leading to questions about missing time.

I did not remember that sighting for months until one day it just popped back into my head

noeticextraordinary
7/10

wondering about missing time and past experiences

visualextraordinary
8/10

observed a soft white-yellow orb with hard edges

grey(few)
70%
Demeanornot statedCommunicationnot statedInteractionnone
blue being(few)
80%
Demeanornot statedCommunicationnot statedInteractionnone

Appearance: short blue-skinned, flat-faced figures

Colorwhite-yellow
Luminositynot stated
Soundnot stated
Movementhovering, darting
Five Observables (2/5)
positive lift low observability hypersonic velocity trans medium travel instantaneous acceleration

The experiencer observed a soft white-yellow orb with hard edges hovering over their car, moving back and forth before darting into the trees and up into space.

What makes this encounter unique

The experiencer had a significant gap in memory regarding the sighting, leading to questions about missing time, which is a common theme among other witnesses they interviewed.

✦ AI-extracted phenomenological analysis — verify against source testimony

Have you had a similar experience?

Many people have reported encounters they struggle to explain. You are not alone. Project Profound collects and analyzes these accounts to advance understanding.

Talk about it with AI →

Analysis Summary

Program Intel Profile
interviewTopic: whistleblower testimonyIntel Value: 7/10
1

Mark Dennett

First-Person

Contact Experience Triad

Hynek: not_stated
2

Dorothy

First-Person

Contact Experience Triad

Hynek: not_stated
3

Preston Dennett

First-Person

Contact Experience Triad

Hynek: CE1
4

Preston's Sister-in-law (Christine)

First-Person

Contact Experience Triad

Hynek: CE1
5

Unnamed Child (of a lady from Indiana)

First-Person

Contact Experience Triad

Hynek: CE1