Somewhere in the Skies | Witness Accounts: Volume Eighteen

S
Somewhere in the Skies w/ Ryan Sprague
·
November 29, 2021
1.5K views
Tier 1First Person EncounterFirst-Person Account
Experiencer: Robbie, Vivian, Unnamed Witness 1, Unnamed Witness 2, David

Analysis Summary

Program Intel Profile
interviewTopic: otherIntel Value: 8/10

Robbie

Contact Experience Triad

Hynek: CE1

Vivian

Contact Experience Triad

Hynek: CE1

Unnamed Witness 1

Contact Experience Triad

Hynek: not_stated

Unnamed Witness 2

Contact Experience Triad

Hynek: not_stated

David

Contact Experience Triad

Hynek: CE1

The Encounter

The person is an Air Force veteran who served at Shepherd Air Force Base in the 1970s. One night, he and two friends saw two bright lights in the sky while they were talking. The first light was moving at about 100 miles per hour, and the second light was moving faster. When the second light caught up to the first, they merged into one light and shot straight up at incredible speed. The veteran, who has experience with aircraft, found this speed astonishing. They did not report the sighting because they were unsure how to do so. The encounter sparked his curiosity about UAPs and led him to discuss similar experiences with other military personnel, highlighting a stigma around reporting such events.

✦ AI Generated

Program Intelligence Analysis

Executive Summary

The video features multiple firsthand accounts of UFO sightings from various individuals, including military veterans and civilians. Each account describes unique experiences with unidentified aerial phenomena, highlighting the witnesses' curiosity and the stigma surrounding such encounters.

Primary Revelation

Witnesses consistently report high-speed maneuvers and unusual light patterns that defy conventional aircraft capabilities.

R
Robbie
witnesspro disclosure
Air Force
military servicefirst-hand observation

I have never seen anything in all the years travel nearly that speed, nothing at all.

V
Vivian
witnesspro disclosure

What we witnessed that night was just so far beyond human capability.

R
Rafi
witnesspro disclosure

I simply took the experience completely as it happened.

D
David
witnesspro disclosure

I don't know what it was, you know, I don't know what the craft was.

historical eventspecific

In January 1976, security police at Cannon Air Force Base observed UFOs on the flight line, which were reported to Washington DC and made local newspapers.

Source: RobbieEvent: 1976-01-01 | Claimed: 2023-10-01
non human intelligencehighly specific

Robbie observed two lights traveling at high speeds, which merged into one light and shot straight up into the sky.

Source: RobbieEvent: 1975-01-01 | Claimed: 2023-10-01
non human intelligencespecific

Vivian witnessed a reddish-orange ball of light hovering above Mount Black in Australia, which exhibited unusual movement patterns.

Source: VivianEvent: 1997-06-01 | Claimed: 2023-10-01
non human intelligencespecific

Rafi described a glowing sphere that floated silently above a river, which communicated with him in a way he couldn't understand.

Source: RafiEvent: 1980-01-01 | Claimed: 2023-10-01
non human intelligencespecific

David reported seeing bright lights and laser dots surrounding him and his girlfriend while they were parked in a secluded area.

Source: DavidEvent: 2016-01-01 | Claimed: 2023-10-01
✦ AI-extracted program intelligence — verify against source testimony
1

Observed two bright lights in the sky that merged and shot straight up.

Robbie · First-Person

Encounter Context

Factual Details
1975-01-01around midnightYear: 1975

southwest of Shepherd Air Force Base

Wichita Falls, Texas, united_states

rurallow overcast skies
Connected Encounters (1)
Shepherd Air Force Base
Military Witness
Branchair force
BaseShepherd Air Force Base
Dutystationed
Service1974-1975
3 witnesses mentioned

Encounter Research Breakdown

Phenomenological Analysis
physical sightingCE1
Moderate Evidential StrengthScore: 14/21first person
Detail & Specificity
2/3
Corroboration
1/3
Physical Evidence
1/3
Unpredictability
3/3
Perceptual Clarity
2/3
Timely Reporting
3/3
Witness Credibility
2/3

The account is provided by an Air Force veteran with a specific timeframe and location, enhancing credibility. The observation includes details about the lights' brightness and speed, but lacks corroboration and physical effects, limiting the overall evidential strength.

initial sightingunknown

The experiencer and two friends observed two bright lights in the sky, initially thinking they were aircraft.

two lights came into view about as bright as 1970s headlights

end of observationunknown

The lights were observed traveling at high speeds without typical aircraft lighting, leading to uncertainty about their nature.

we didn't observe any strobes or nav lights

visual
6/10

two bright lights in the sky

The analysis found no relevant content for this section.

What makes this encounter unique

The encounter involved two bright lights traveling at high speeds without typical aircraft lighting, leading to uncertainty about their nature.

✦ AI-extracted phenomenological analysis — verify against source testimony
2

Saw a reddish-orange ball of light hovering and moving in unusual patterns.

Vivian · First-Person

Encounter Context

Factual Details
1976-01-01Year: 1976

Cannon Air Force Base

united_states

military base
Military Witness
Branchair force
BaseCannon Air Force Base
3 witnesses mentioned
Reported to authorities

reported by Cannon Air Force Base command to Washington DC

Connected Events
Cannon Air Force Base UFO SightingsJanuary 1976

Encounter Research Breakdown

Phenomenological Analysis
physical sightingCE1
Moderate Evidential StrengthScore: 15/21first person
Detail & Specificity
2/3
Corroboration
2/3
Physical Evidence
1/3
Unpredictability
3/3
Perceptual Clarity
3/3
Timely Reporting
1/3
Witness Credibility
3/3

The speaker provides a detailed account of witnessing a UAP with significant speed and behavior, supported by their background in aviation. However, the account lacks corroboration from other witnesses directly related to the primary observation, and the report of the 1976 incident is based on second-hand information.

initial observationunknown

The experiencer and others observed two lights in the sky, one catching up to the other before they merged into one.

the instant that the second light caught up with the first it became one light

rapid ascensionunknown

The merged light shot straight up at an extraordinary speed, leaving the experiencer in awe of its capabilities.

it's shot straight up vertical from a zero vertical speed to thousands of miles an hour

discussion and reflectionunknown

After the sighting, the experiencer and others discussed the event but did not report it due to uncertainty.

we didn't report it because we didn't know how to or where to

visualextraordinary
8/10

Two lights merging and ascending rapidly

The analysis found no relevant content for this section.

Luminositynot stated
Soundnot stated
Movementinstant acceleration
Five Observables (3/5)
positive lift low observability hypersonic velocity trans medium travel instantaneous acceleration

The experiencer observed two lights that merged and then ascended vertically at an extraordinary speed, unlike anything they had seen before.

What makes this encounter unique

The encounter is unique due to the extraordinary speed of the lights observed, which the experiencer has never witnessed in their extensive aviation experience.

✦ AI-extracted phenomenological analysis — verify against source testimony
4

Saw two orange lights that rapidly changed size and disappeared.

Unnamed Witness 1 · First-Person

Encounter Context

Factual Details

Black River

Queensland, australia

ruralsparsely populated suburb

Encounter Research Breakdown

Phenomenological Analysis
not statednot_statedDuration: not_stated
Low Evidential StrengthScore: 8/21first person
Detail & Specificity
1/3
Corroboration
1/3
Physical Evidence
1/3
Unpredictability
2/3
Perceptual Clarity
1/3
Timely Reporting
1/3
Witness Credibility
1/3

The account lacks specific details about the UAP encounter and does not provide corroboration or clear observational clarity. The witness's credibility is not established, and there are no reported physical effects or temporal context for the report.

The analysis found no relevant content for this section.

The analysis found no relevant content for this section.

The analysis found no relevant content for this section.

What makes this encounter unique

The encounter is characterized by a strong sense of curiosity rather than fear, reflecting a desire for understanding rather than a traumatic experience.

✦ AI-extracted phenomenological analysis — verify against source testimony
5

Observed lights in the sky and laser dots surrounding them.

Unnamed Witness 2 · First-Person

Encounter Context

Factual Details
1997-06-01early eveningYear: 1997

large remote property for horses

ruralbushland
Connected Encounters (1)
government land
3 witnesses mentionedmomdad

Encounter Research Breakdown

Phenomenological Analysis
not statednot_stated
Low Evidential StrengthScore: 10/21first person
Detail & Specificity
2/3
Corroboration
1/3
Physical Evidence
1/3
Unpredictability
2/3
Perceptual Clarity
1/3
Timely Reporting
1/3
Witness Credibility
2/3

The account lacks specific details about the UAP encounter itself, focusing instead on the context and setting. There are no clear observations of the UAP, corroboration, or physical effects mentioned, leading to a low score overall.

preliminary setupunknown

The experiencer recalls the setting and context of the encounter, including the time of year and location.

i remember around this time was when princess diana was killed in paris so i believe this could be correct

visual
5/10

clear evening sky

The analysis found no relevant content for this section.

What makes this encounter unique

The encounter is set in a remote location with no artificial light, creating a unique atmosphere for potential UAP observation.

✦ AI-extracted phenomenological analysis — verify against source testimony
6

Had a dream about being taken aboard a UFO and later saw lights in the sky.

David · First-Person

Encounter Context

Factual Details

The analysis found no structured encounter context.

Encounter Research Breakdown

Phenomenological Analysis
physical sightingCE1
Moderate Evidential StrengthScore: 15/21first person
Detail & Specificity
2/3
Corroboration
1/3
Physical Evidence
1/3
Unpredictability
3/3
Perceptual Clarity
3/3
Timely Reporting
4/3
Witness Credibility
1/3

The account provides a personal observation of a UAP with moderate clarity and some specific details, such as the color and shape of the object. However, the witness's credibility is unclear, and there is no corroboration or physical effects reported.

initial observationminutes

The experiencer and a parent observed a bright reddish-orange ball of light hovering above a mountain.

i looked up and saw a reddish orange ball of light hovering above mount black

movement of the lightminutes

The light began to move in an unusual manner, zipping across the sky and stopping intermittently.

it started to move but not in the way that any aerial craft at the time moved

visualextraordinary
8/10

Bright reddish-orange ball of light in a clear night sky

The analysis found no relevant content for this section.

Sizelarger than the lights of a plane or a helicopter
Colorreddish orange
Luminosityself luminous
Soundnot stated
Movementzig zag
Five Observables (0/5)
positive lift low observability hypersonic velocity trans medium travel instantaneous acceleration

A bright reddish-orange ball of light that hovered and moved in an unusual manner above a mountain.

What makes this encounter unique

The encounter involved a bright light that moved in a way not typical of known aerial craft, creating a sense of curiosity and confusion.

✦ AI-extracted phenomenological analysis — verify against source testimony

Have you had a similar experience?

Many people have reported encounters they struggle to explain. You are not alone. Project Profound collects and analyzes these accounts to advance understanding.

Talk about it with AI →

Analysis Summary

Program Intel Profile
interviewTopic: otherIntel Value: 8/10
1

Robbie

First-Person

Contact Experience Triad

Hynek: CE1
2

Vivian

First-Person

Contact Experience Triad

Hynek: CE1
3

Unnamed Child (described at 30:00)

Retold Account

This is a retold account. Triad scoring requires direct experiencer testimony.

4

Unnamed Witness 1

First-Person

Contact Experience Triad

Hynek: not_stated
5

Unnamed Witness 2

First-Person

Contact Experience Triad

Hynek: not_stated
6

David

First-Person

Contact Experience Triad

Hynek: CE1