Skywatcher Part I: The Journey Begins

S
SKYWATCHER
·
January 28, 2025
731.9K views
Tier 1First Person EncounterInterview with Experiencer

Analysis Summary

Program Intel Profile
interviewTopic: otherIntel Value: 8/10

Jacob Barber

Contact Experience Triad

Hynek: CE3

Jordan

Contact Experience Triad

Hynek: CE4

Dan Flexar

Contact Experience Triad

Hynek: CE1

Michael Batista

Contact Experience Triad

Hynek: CE1

Unnamed Witness 1

Contact Experience Triad

Hynek: NL

The Encounter

Alex Clus is an entrepreneur who believes that extraterrestrial intelligence has been visiting Earth for a long time. He invited Dr. Gary Nolan and Colonel Carl Nell to discuss their confidence in this belief, both stating they are 100% certain non-human intelligence exists and interacts with humanity. Clus and his team, including Jacob Barber and Jordan, conducted a project to gather evidence of these claims. They aimed to prove that human consciousness can interface with non-human technology. During their operation, they observed unusual lights in the sky and reported a mass UAP sighting. This experience led Clus to question his assumptions about reality and sparked a desire to validate these extraordinary claims through further investigation.

✦ AI Generated

Program Intelligence Analysis

Executive Summary

The video features discussions among various individuals asserting the existence of non-human intelligence and its interaction with humanity. Claims include the recovery of non-human craft and the involvement of consciousness in interfacing with technology. The initiative aims to gather evidence to validate these extraordinary claims.

Primary Revelation

Extraterrestrial intelligence has not just visited Earth, it has been here a long time and is still here.

A
Alex Clus
investigatorpro disclosure
Salt

I think you can go a step further, it hasn't just visited, it's been here a long time and it's still here.

D
Dr. Gary Nolan
scientistpro disclosure
Stanford University
tenured professor

If you had to assign a probability to that statement, what probability would you assign? 100%.

C
Colonel Carl Nell
military officialpro disclosure

Non-human intelligence exists, non-human intelligence has been interacting with humanity.

J
Jacob Barber
contractor employeepro disclosure
Department of DefenseDepartment of the Interior
30 years of serviceworked covertly and overtly

Yes, I do believe that a higher form of nonhuman intelligence has been visiting this planet.

J
Jordan
scientistpro disclosure

I am certain of that.

D
Dan Flexar
military officialpro disclosure
Air Force

I've seen a lot of things that I just cannot explain.

M
Michael Batista
military officialpro disclosure
US Army

I know that is true.

Skywatchercurrent (unknown to unknown)alleged

Managed by: Salt

Validate or invalidate claims of UAP sightings and interactions

Psionic Exploitation Programrecent (2005 to 2010)alleged

Managed by: unknown

Investigate human consciousness interfacing with technology

non human intelligencespecific

Extraterrestrial intelligence has not just visited Earth, it has been here a long time and is still here.

Source: Alex Clus
non human intelligencespecific

Dr. Gary Nolan assigned a 100% probability to the existence of extraterrestrial intelligence.

Source: Alex Clus
non human intelligencespecific

Colonel Carl Nell stated that non-human intelligence exists and has been interacting with humanity.

Source: Alex Clus
crash retrievalspecific

Individuals on the crash recovery team have held and transported supposed craft of non-human origin.

Source: Alex Clus
crash retrievalspecific

The crash recovery program was set up to recover exotic or non-human aircraft.

Source: Jake Barber
technologyspecific

The technology of the recovered craft was inconceivable as being manmade.

Source: Jake Barber
reverse engineeringspecific

The interface to manipulate the power plant of the recovered craft was done through the mind, not mechanical means.

Source: Jake Barber
non human intelligencespecific

There is a psionics team that can summon craft through focused thought.

Source: Jake Barber
reverse engineeringspecific

The psionics program involved interfacing human consciousness with UAP.

Source: Jordan
historical eventspecific

There was a mass UAP sighting in the area where the operation took place.

Source: Alex Clus
✦ AI-extracted program intelligence — verify against source testimony
1

Involvement in crash recovery of non-human craft and consciousness interface technology.

Jacob Barber · Interview

Encounter Context

Factual Details
Military Witness
Branchair force
Dutyinvolved in crash recovery projects
Service30 years
2 witnesses mentionedJacob BarberColonel Carl Nell

Encounter Research Breakdown

Phenomenological Analysis
close encounterCE3
Moderate Evidential StrengthScore: 15/21reported
Detail & Specificity
2/3
Corroboration
2/3
Physical Evidence
1/3
Unpredictability
3/3
Perceptual Clarity
2/3
Timely Reporting
3/3
Witness Credibility
2/3

The account presents claims from multiple individuals, including Colonel Nell and Jacob Barber, who assert the existence of non-human intelligence and involvement in crash recovery projects. However, the reliance on secondhand sources and the lack of direct corroboration limits the overall evidential strength.

initial awarenessunknown

The experiencer discusses the confidence of military personnel regarding non-human intelligence and their interactions with humanity.

non-human intelligence exists non-human intelligence has been interacting with Humanity

involvement in crash recoveryunknown

The experiencer describes involvement in crash recovery projects related to non-human craft, emphasizing the extraordinary nature of the claims.

we were deployed on particular tasks which included the discovery of exotic craft of nonhuman origin

understanding of craftunknown

The experiencer shares insights about the craft's appearance and the unusual reactions of the recovery team.

the object or technology itself was something that was inconceivable as being manmade

noeticextraordinary
7/10

understanding of consciousness interfacing with technology

visualextraordinary
8/10

descriptions of the craft's abstract appearance

The analysis found no relevant content for this section.

Shapedisc
Colormetallic
Luminositynot stated
Soundnot stated
Five Observables (0/5)
positive lift low observability hypersonic velocity trans medium travel instantaneous acceleration

The craft was described as a metallic egg, abstract in appearance, and not manmade.

What makes this encounter unique

The encounter is unique due to the involvement of military personnel and the discussion of non-human craft recovery, emphasizing the extraordinary nature of the claims.

✦ AI-extracted phenomenological analysis — verify against source testimony
2

Participation in a psionic exploitation program involving non-human intelligence.

Jordan · Interview

Encounter Context

Factual Details
2005-01-01Year: 2005
Military Witness
Dutyinvolved in psionic exploitation program
2 witnesses mentionedJordanJake

Encounter Research Breakdown

Phenomenological Analysis
close encounterCE41 entityunknown
Low Evidential StrengthScore: 11/21first person
Detail & Specificity
1/3
Corroboration
1/3
Physical Evidence
1/3
Unpredictability
3/3
Perceptual Clarity
2/3
Timely Reporting
1/3
Witness Credibility
2/3

The speaker presents a highly speculative account of interfacing human consciousness with UAP technology, but lacks verifiable details and corroboration. The claims are based on personal experience without independent evidence or supporting witnesses.

Initial Awareness of Non-Human Intelligenceunknown

The experiencer discusses their certainty about non-human intelligence visiting Earth, stemming from personal experiences in a psionic exploitation program.

I am certain of that; my firsthand experience in what I term a psionic exploitation program...

Engagement with Consciousness and Technologyunknown

The experiencer describes their involvement in a program that explored the interface between human consciousness and UAP technology.

Ultimately what we were really investigating was how far could we stretch the balance of human consciousness...

Interaction with Non-Human Intelligenceunknown

The experiencer recounts their ability to project consciousness into recovered crafts and access commands.

My Consciousness could project into these craft and recovered materials and then access a suite of commands...

noeticextraordinary
8/10

The experiencer describes a deep understanding and ability to interface with technology through consciousness.

?
unknown(many)
70%
Demeanornot statedCommunicationtelepathyInteractionconsensual contact

Message: The experiencer discusses interfacing with non-human intelligence.

I interfaced and worked with non-human intelligence and things like UAP directly.

Luminositynot stated
Soundnot stated
Five Observables (0/5)
positive lift low observability hypersonic velocity trans medium travel instantaneous acceleration

The experiencer discusses their interaction with recovered crafts but does not provide specific details about their appearance.

What makes this encounter unique

The encounter uniquely emphasizes the interface between human consciousness and non-human technology, suggesting a profound connection beyond physical interaction.

✦ AI-extracted phenomenological analysis — verify against source testimony
3

Witnessing unexplainable phenomena during military service and current skywatching initiative.

Dan Flexar · Interview

Encounter Context

Factual Details

California desert

California, united_states

desert
Military Witness
Branchair force
Dutyspecial tactics, rescuing recovery medical operations
Service20
3 witnesses mentionedDan FlexarMichael Batista

Encounter Research Breakdown

Phenomenological Analysis
ongoing contactCE1Duration: 3_days
Moderate Evidential StrengthScore: 15/21first person
Detail & Specificity
2/3
Corroboration
2/3
Physical Evidence
1/3
Unpredictability
3/3
Perceptual Clarity
3/3
Timely Reporting
1/3
Witness Credibility
3/3

The account presents a detailed narrative from individuals with military backgrounds discussing their efforts to observe and verify UAP phenomena. While the credibility of the witnesses is bolstered by their military experience, the observations lack corroboration and specific verifiable details, limiting the overall evidential strength.

initial gathering and setupdays

A group of 15 people assembles in the California desert to investigate UAP claims using various teams and technologies.

we are here to see what happens; we are going to spend 3 days together leveraging the cionic team

Observation of Anomalous Objectsunknown

The team observes various anomalous objects in the sky, noting their erratic movements and potential intelligence.

we started seeing erratic Movement; we started seeing some vertical tracks then tracks going from like left to right

visualextraordinary
8/10

observing anomalous objects in the sky

The analysis found no relevant content for this section.

Luminositynot stated
Soundnot stated
Movementerratic, vertical, horizontal
Five Observables (0/5)
positive lift low observability hypersonic velocity trans medium travel instantaneous acceleration

The team observed various anomalous objects exhibiting erratic movements, including vertical and horizontal tracks.

What makes this encounter unique

The encounter is unique due to the organized effort of a specialized team attempting to summon and track UAPs in a systematic manner.

✦ AI-extracted phenomenological analysis — verify against source testimony
4

Experiences with UAPs during military service and belief in non-human intelligence.

Michael Batista · Interview

Encounter Context

Factual Details

base camp

Military Witness
Branchair force
Service20
15 witnesses mentionedFredDr. NolanDon Paul

Encounter Research Breakdown

Phenomenological Analysis
close encounterCE11 entityunknown
Moderate Evidential StrengthScore: 17/21first person
Detail & Specificity
3/3
Corroboration
2/3
Physical Evidence
1/3
Unpredictability
3/3
Perceptual Clarity
3/3
Timely Reporting
2/3
Witness Credibility
3/3

The account presents a detailed observation of unusual lights and a specific object, supported by multiple witnesses. However, the lack of corroborating evidence and the subjective nature of some claims limit the overall evidential strength.

initial observationunknown

The experiencer and a group observed unusual lights in the sky that appeared and disappeared, moving in patterns that seemed atypical for known aerial phenomena.

all 15 of us saw some form of unusual lights in the sky

attempted communicationunknown

The group attempted to communicate with a potential craft or entity while observing from a rooftop.

a couple of folks that felt like it was a good time to try to communicate with potentially a craft or an entity

entity appearanceunknown

An elongated oval object was observed, described as gray and matte, appearing suddenly above the base camp.

it was all gray matte like not shiny at all

interaction with entityunknown

The experiencer noted a correlation between the psionics team's communication attempts and the appearance of the object.

there was a correlation so we have an egg shaped object... connected to our psionics team

visualextraordinary
8/10

Observed unusual lights and a gray matte object in the sky

?
unknown(single)
80%
DemeanorneutralCommunicationnoneInteractionobservation

Appearance: elongated oval, gray matte

Size5 to 8 m long
Colorgray matte
Luminositynot stated
Soundsilent
Movementhovering
Five Observables (1/5)
positive lift low observability hypersonic velocity trans medium travel instantaneous acceleration

An elongated oval gray object was observed, described as having no visible propulsion or sound, appearing suddenly above the base camp.

What makes this encounter unique

The encounter involved a group observation of unusual aerial phenomena, with a specific focus on the correlation between attempted communication and the appearance of a gray object.

✦ AI-extracted phenomenological analysis — verify against source testimony
5

Observation of unusual lights in the sky during a skywatching event.

Unnamed Witness 1 · First-Person

Encounter Context

Factual Details

area where we ran our operation

Military Witness
Service25 years
Reported to authorities

FAA imposed a temporary flight restriction over the area

Connected Events
mass UAP sighting

Encounter Research Breakdown

Phenomenological Analysis
physical sightingNL
Low Evidential StrengthScore: 10/21commentary
Detail & Specificity
1/3
Corroboration
1/3
Physical Evidence
1/3
Unpredictability
2/3
Perceptual Clarity
1/3
Timely Reporting
2/3
Witness Credibility
2/3

The speaker discusses their background and the complexities of UAP experiences but does not provide a specific first-person account of an encounter. The claims made are general and lack precise details or corroboration, resulting in a low evidential strength score.

initial awarenessunknown

The experiencer reflects on the complexities of UAPs and the challenges of discussing such experiences due to societal stigma.

it's very hard for people who have seen and experienced things to discuss it because even our own loved ones you don't want people to think you're crazy

mass uap sightingunknown

During an event, a mass UAP sighting occurred, leading to numerous reports from residents and significant media attention.

there was a mass UAP sighting directly in the area where we ran our operation

noeticextraordinary
7/10

shift in understanding of reality and technology

visualextraordinary
8/10

sighting of anomalous objects in the sky

The analysis found no relevant content for this section.

What makes this encounter unique

The encounter highlights the tension between pragmatic understanding and the abstract nature of UAP phenomena, emphasizing a shift in reality perception.

✦ AI-extracted phenomenological analysis — verify against source testimony

Have you had a similar experience?

Many people have reported encounters they struggle to explain. You are not alone. Project Profound collects and analyzes these accounts to advance understanding.

Talk about it with AI →

Analysis Summary

Program Intel Profile
interviewTopic: otherIntel Value: 8/10
1

Jacob Barber

Interview

Contact Experience Triad

Hynek: CE3
2

Jordan

Interview

Contact Experience Triad

Hynek: CE4
3

Dan Flexar

Interview

Contact Experience Triad

Hynek: CE1
4

Michael Batista

Interview

Contact Experience Triad

Hynek: CE1
5

Unnamed Witness 1

First-Person

Contact Experience Triad

Hynek: NL