The New Coverup, UAP Activism, Private Sector & Moving Forward /w Bruce Fenton & Jeremy Rys
Analysis Summary
Summary
The discussion features Bruce Fenton and Jeremy Reese, who are both researchers in the field of UAPs. They share their views on the current state of ufology and government transparency regarding UAPs. Jeremy mentions that several whistleblowers have testified about crash retrieval programs, but he remains skeptical about the government's willingness to disclose information. Bruce highlights the influence of powerful private corporations on government decisions regarding UAPs. Both express concerns about the lack of transparency and the potential for private interests to hinder genuine disclosure. They emphasize the importance of scientific inquiry and skepticism in understanding UAP phenomena. Overall, they believe that real progress in ufology may come from grassroots efforts rather than relying solely on government disclosures.
Program Intelligence Analysis
The discussion highlights the complexities of UFO research, including the intertwining of government and private sector interests, the challenges of disclosure, and the historical stigma surrounding UFO reporting in the military. Key claims include testimonies from whistleblowers and the role of the Battelle Memorial Institute in managing classified information.
Nearly two dozen whistleblowers have testified regarding crash retrieval programs.
Bruce Fenton
“I think we have to kind of be realistic and say that it's not a kind of disclosure that can happen just because politicians would want to bring out evidence of secret projects.”
Jeremy Reese
“I think that there's programs that are being flaunted and promoted by a lot of people in the mainstream media.”
Managed by: government
Reverse engineering of unidentified aerial phenomena
Senator Gillibrand stated that nearly two dozen whistleblowers have testified before the Senate hearings regarding crash retrieval programs and reverse engineering.
The Title 50 limitation restricts the intelligence collection capabilities of programs like Arrow to only about 20% of the total intelligence data pool.
The Battelle Memorial Institute has been accused of holding classified information and acting as a cover organization for government UFO files.
The government has revealed itself to be intertwined with private sector interests, which complicates the disclosure of UFO-related technologies.
The stigma around reporting UFOs has historically hindered military personnel from reporting potential threats, which could now include advanced drones.