Saturday night Livestream πŸ›ΈπŸ›© A-10 UAP, Jax UFO, and Amsterdam UAP filmed by 2 of the Guests!

L
Lehto Files
Β·
August 31, 2021
11.8K views
Tier 1 β€” First Person EncounterInterview with Experiencer
Experiencer: Andy, Dave, Max

Analysis Summary

Program Intel Profile
panel discussionTopic: military encountersIntel Value: 7/10

Andy

Contact Experience Triad

Hynek: CE1

Dave

Contact Experience Triad

Hynek: CE1

Max

Contact Experience Triad

Hynek: CE1

The Encounter

The encounter involves Andy, a UAP investigator from New York, who had a UFO experience as a child. During a live stream discussion with Chris Lato and others, Andy shared details of his encounter. He described seeing a stationary object in the sky while at work. He initially thought it might be a camera issue but confirmed it was not. The object remained visible for about 15 minutes before disappearing when he went to get a better camera. This experience has significantly impacted Andy's life, leading him to dedicate himself to UAP research and share his findings with others.

✦ AI Generated

Program Intelligence Analysis

Executive Summary

The discussion features UAP investigators sharing their personal experiences and insights into UAP sightings. They analyze footage of an object that remained stationary for an extended period, emphasizing its unusual characteristics compared to known aircraft and drones.

Primary Revelation

The object recorded by Dave exhibited no characteristics of known aircraft or drones, remaining stationary and showing a constant heat signature.

C
Chris Lato
investigatorpro disclosure
YouTube Channel
A
Andy
investigatorpro disclosure
UAP Investigator
✦ personal experience

β€œAfter my own personal close encounter I've devoted my life to understanding what I saw, why I saw it, and the significance of their existence to the human race.”

D
Dave Falch
otherpro disclosure
UAP Researcher
✦ 15 years of experience with FLIR cameras

β€œI watched it for 10-15 minutes and I didn't see any glaring or flaring.”

M
Max Moskovitch
journalistpro disclosure
UAP Researcher
V
Vinnie
journalistpro disclosure
UAP Researcher
non human intelligencespecific

After my own personal close encounter, I've devoted my life to understanding what I saw, why I saw it, and the significance of their existence to the human race.

Source: Andy
otherspecific

The object I observed remained stationary for about 10-15 minutes without any movement.

Source: Dave
technologyspecific

I have been working on FLIR cameras for the last 15 years and can analyze the footage to determine what is going on inside the systems.

Source: Dave
otherspecific

The object I recorded did not exhibit any characteristics of a drone or bird, remaining stationary and showing a constant heat signature.

Source: Dave
non human intelligencespecific

The footage I received from an anonymous source showed a genuine object buzzing an Air Force jet.

Source: Andy
✦ AI-extracted program intelligence β€” verify against source testimony
1

Saw a disc-shaped object hovering over his house as a child.

Andy Β· First-Person

Encounter Context

Factual Details
10:00 AMYear: 2016

near Cecil Field Airport

Jacksonville, Florida, united_states

Connected Encounters (1)
Cecil Field Airport
Military Witness
Dutyborder patrol
2 witnesses mentionedDaveAndy
Reported to authorities

two suits from the air force took copies of the footage but did not ask questions

Connected Events
Tucson Drone IncidentFebruary 2023

Encounter Research Breakdown

Phenomenological Analysis
physical sightingCE1Duration: 20_minutes
Moderate Evidential StrengthScore: 15/21first person
β—ŽDetail & Specificity
2/3
≑Corroboration
2/3
↑Physical Evidence
1/3
β—‡Unpredictability
3/3
β—‰Perceptual Clarity
3/3
β—·Timely Reporting
2/3
β˜…Witness Credibility
2/3

The speaker provides a detailed account of their UAP encounter, including the duration of the sighting and the use of infrared technology. However, the account lacks corroboration from other witnesses or independent evidence, and the witness's credibility is somewhat limited due to anonymity. The description of the object is somewhat vague, lacking precise details that could enhance verifiability.

initial observationminutes

The experiencer observed a stationary object in the sky for about five minutes, initially using standard and infrared cameras.

β€œI said let's get this out of here and put a high def flare in place”

object disappearsminutes

After switching cameras, the object was no longer visible, leading to disappointment.

β€œthe thing just left... it was just gone”

visual
5/10

Observed a stationary object in the sky

The analysis found no relevant content for this section.

Shapeunknown
Sizeaircraft-sized
Luminositynot stated
Soundsilent
Five Observables (0/5)
βœ— positive liftβœ— low observabilityβœ— hypersonic velocityβœ— trans medium travelβœ— instantaneous acceleration

The object was observed as a stationary heat signature in the sky, visible in infrared but not in standard visual.

What makes this encounter unique

The encounter involved a professional with expertise in infrared technology, providing a unique perspective on the object's characteristics.

✦ AI-extracted phenomenological analysis β€” verify against source testimony
2

Captured a stationary object on infrared camera while working.

Dave Β· First-Person

Encounter Context

Factual Details

out back where we stage our systems

2 witnesses mentionedAndy

Encounter Research Breakdown

Phenomenological Analysis
physical sightingCE1Duration: 15_minutes
Low Evidential StrengthScore: 11/21first person
β—ŽDetail & Specificity
2/3
≑Corroboration
1/3
↑Physical Evidence
1/3
β—‡Unpredictability
2/3
β—‰Perceptual Clarity
2/3
β—·Timely Reporting
2/3
β˜…Witness Credibility
1/3

The account presents a personal observation of an object but lacks credible witness context and specific details. The description of the object is vague, and there is no corroboration or physical evidence mentioned.

initial observationminutes

The experiencer was called to observe an object outside, initially skeptical but intrigued by its unusual behavior.

β€œI said well what the hell is that said I don't know I said been sitting here looking at for like 10-15 minutes”

visual
5/10

Observed an object that appeared unusual and static in the sky.

The analysis found no relevant content for this section.

Shapeunknown
Luminositynot stated
Soundnot stated
Movementzig zag
Five Observables (0/5)
βœ— positive liftβœ— low observabilityβœ— hypersonic velocityβœ— trans medium travelβœ— instantaneous acceleration

The object was observed to remain stationary for an extended period, with unusual movement patterns that were not typical of known aerial phenomena.

What makes this encounter unique

The object exhibited unusual behavior by remaining stationary for an extended period, which is atypical for aerial objects.

✦ AI-extracted phenomenological analysis β€” verify against source testimony
4

Witnessed three lights in a triangle formation, one of which shot down.

Max Β· First-Person

Encounter Context

Factual Details
10:00 AM

near Cecil Field Airport

Jacksonville, Florida, united_states

Military Witness
2 witnesses mentionedDaveAndy
Reported to authorities

two individuals in suits took copies of the footage and left without asking questions

Connected Events
Tucson Drone IncidentFebruary 2023

Encounter Research Breakdown

Phenomenological Analysis
physical sightingCE1Duration: 20_minutes
Moderate Evidential StrengthScore: 15/21first person
β—ŽDetail & Specificity
2/3
≑Corroboration
2/3
↑Physical Evidence
1/3
β—‡Unpredictability
3/3
β—‰Perceptual Clarity
3/3
β—·Timely Reporting
2/3
β˜…Witness Credibility
2/3

The account provides a detailed description of the UAP encounter, including the duration of observation and the use of infrared technology. However, the witness's credibility is somewhat limited due to the lack of independent corroboration and specific verifiable details about the object. The experience was unexpected, and while there are some subjective physical effects mentioned, they are not documented or measurable.

initial observationminutes

The experiencer observed a stationary object in the sky for about five minutes before attempting to switch to a high-definition camera.

β€œit was about five minutes and it was the same thing”

object disappearsminutes

After switching cameras, the object was no longer visible, leading to disappointment.

β€œthe thing just left... it was just gone”

visual
5/10

Observed a stationary object in the sky

The analysis found no relevant content for this section.

Sizeaircraft size, approximately 30 feet
Luminositynot stated
Soundnot stated
Five Observables (0/5)
βœ— positive liftβœ— low observabilityβœ— hypersonic velocityβœ— trans medium travelβœ— instantaneous acceleration

The experiencer observed a stationary object in the sky that was visible through infrared and visual cameras.

What makes this encounter unique

The encounter involved a professional technician using specialized cameras to capture a stationary object, which was later lost when attempting to switch to a high-definition camera.

✦ AI-extracted phenomenological analysis β€” verify against source testimony

Have you had a similar experience?

Many people have reported encounters they struggle to explain. You are not alone. Project Profound collects and analyzes these accounts to advance understanding.

Talk about it with AI β†’

Analysis Summary

Program Intel Profile
panel discussionTopic: military encountersIntel Value: 7/10
1

Andy

First-Person

Contact Experience Triad

Hynek: CE1
2

Dave

First-Person

Contact Experience Triad

Hynek: CE1
3

Unnamed Air Force Pilot

Retold Account

This is a retold account. Triad scoring requires direct experiencer testimony.

4

Max

First-Person

Contact Experience Triad

Hynek: CE1