Melinda Leslie, Miesha Johnston, Lorien Fenton & Jocelyn Buckner (EDIT): Ladies Of Milab

E
Experiencer Interviews
·
September 22, 2020
1.9K views
Tier 1First Person EncounterInterview with Experiencer
Experiencer: Melinda Leslie, Miesha Johnston, Jocelyn Buckner, Lorien Fenton

Analysis Summary

Program Intel Profile
interviewTopic: otherIntel Value: 8/10

Melinda Leslie

Contact Experience Triad

Hynek: CE4

Miesha Johnston

Contact Experience Triad

Hynek: CE3

Jocelyn Buckner

Contact Experience Triad

Hynek: CE3

Lorien Fenton

Contact Experience Triad

Hynek: CE4

The Encounter

The individuals involved in this UAP encounter are a group of experiencers discussing their military abduction experiences, known as MILABs. They share that their encounters began in childhood and continued into adulthood. Melinda Leslie recalls her experiences starting in childhood, while Jocelyn Buckner and Misha Johnston mention similar timelines. They describe various types of encounters, including abductions and interactions with both extraterrestrial beings and military personnel. The group emphasizes the importance of sharing their experiences and the need for understanding both positive and negative aspects of contact. The impact of these encounters includes ongoing discussions about the nature of their experiences and a desire to raise awareness about the complexities of UAP phenomena.

✦ AI Generated

Program Intelligence Analysis

Executive Summary

The video features a discussion among multiple experiencers sharing their personal accounts of military abductions and encounters with non-human entities. They explore the complexities of their experiences, including the interplay between military involvement and extraterrestrial interactions.

Primary Revelation

The military is interested in abductees because they have had alien abduction experiences.

M
Melinda Leslie
witnesspro disclosure
Long-term involvement in UAP researchMultiple witnesses corroborate her experiences

I have had it happen my whole life; I didn't find out until 1989.

J
Jocelyn Buckner
witnesspro disclosure

Mine started probably when I was about four.

M
Misha Johnston
witnesspro disclosure

I had probably six or seven different types of ATS.

L
Lorian Fenton
witnesspro disclosure

I had a my lab experience at your college.

Y
Yannick
witnesspro disclosure

I saw this maybe four-inch black hole hovering in my doorway.

My Labscontemporary (unknown to unknown)alleged

Managed by: military

covert military abductions and experimentation

non human intelligencespecific

My initial recalls were recalling childhood teenage and child abduction experiences.

Source: Melinda Leslie
otherspecific

I had a my lab experience at your college.

Source: Unnamed individual
coverupspecific

The military is interested in abductees because they have had alien abduction experiences.

Source: Unnamed individual
non human intelligencespecific

I experienced a black hole hovering in my doorway.

Source: Unnamed individual
non human intelligencespecific

I saw shadow people moving in front of the bed.

Source: Unnamed individual
otherspecific

I had a taser-like mark on my mouth after an experience.

Source: Unnamed individual
✦ AI-extracted program intelligence — verify against source testimony
1

Melinda Leslie's Encounters

Melinda Leslie · First-Person

Encounter Context

Factual Details
2013-12-01Year: 2013

hotel in Henderson, Nevada

Las Vegas, Nevada, united_states

urban
5 witnesses mentionedMelinda LeslieJocelyn BucknerMisha JohnstonLorian FentonKevin Day
Connected Events
My Lab Experiences at ConferenceDecember 2013

Encounter Research Breakdown

Phenomenological Analysis
close encounterCE41 entityhumanoid
Low Evidential StrengthScore: 10/21commentary
Detail & Specificity
1/3
Corroboration
1/3
Physical Evidence
1/3
Unpredictability
2/3
Perceptual Clarity
2/3
Timely Reporting
1/3
Witness Credibility
2/3

The transcript presents a discussion among multiple individuals sharing personal experiences related to military abductions and UAP encounters. However, the accounts lack specific verifiable details, corroboration, and credible witness context, leading to a low evidential strength score.

initial awarenessunknown

The experiencers discuss their past abduction experiences and the context of their current encounter.

I didn't find out till night I didn't know till 1989 at least I wasn't conscious of it until 1989

abduction experience beginsunknown

The experiencers describe being taken from their hotel rooms during a conference.

I hear noise at the door somebody comes in our security latch was not latched

in the presence of entitiesunknown

Experiencers recall being in a state of paralysis and seeing military personnel and other beings.

I could see very few people I really only in my view because I was paralyzed

interaction with entitiesunknown

Experiencers describe being told it was just a routine checkup by the entities.

Don't worry it's just your yearly checkup

return to consciousnessunknown

Experiencers wake up with memories of the encounter and physical effects.

I wake up and my mouth hurts so bad I can't swallow

noeticextraordinary
7/10

Received information about the experience

visual
5/10

Saw military personnel and other beings

tactile
6/10

Felt shaking and pressure on the body

auditoryextraordinary
7/10

heard a pulsed clicking noise

kinestheticextraordinary
8/10

Felt drugged and unable to move

proprioceptiveextraordinary
8/10

felt paralyzed

electromagneticextraordinary
9/10

Device that rendered them unconscious

humanoid(few)
80%
DemeanorauthoritativeCommunicationverbalInteractionabduction

Appearance: Military personnel in camouflage clothing

Message: routine checkup

Don't worry it's just your yearly checkup

What makes this encounter unique

The encounter involved multiple witnesses experiencing shared memories of military abductions, highlighting the complexity of the phenomenon.

✦ AI-extracted phenomenological analysis — verify against source testimony
2

Experiences of abduction starting from age three, including various types of beings.

Miesha Johnston · First-Person

Encounter Context

Factual Details
2020-10-00Year: 2020

college conference

4 witnesses mentionedLorienKevin DayMichael FelixChris Bledsoe

Encounter Research Breakdown

Phenomenological Analysis
close encounterCE31 entityshadow entity
Low Evidential StrengthScore: 10/21first person
Detail & Specificity
1/3
Corroboration
1/3
Physical Evidence
2/3
Unpredictability
2/3
Perceptual Clarity
2/3
Timely Reporting
1/3
Witness Credibility
1/3

The account presents a series of personal experiences and anecdotal claims related to UAPs and missing time, but lacks clear details and corroboration. The witness's credibility is not established, and the observations are vague and subjective.

preliminary experiencesunknown

The experiencer discusses prior experiences and missing time related to a conference, hinting at a connection to UAP phenomena.

I thought it sounded like she had about two hours of missing time

heightened awarenessunknown

The experiencer describes seeing shadow beings and feeling the presence of other dimensional beings during a high fever.

I was seeing all kinds of shadow beans and all kinds of things going on in the building

post-conference reflectionunknown

The experiencer reflects on the events after returning home, realizing the significance of their experiences at the conference.

I realized there were probably just tons of other dimensional beings running around the building all weekend

noeticextraordinary
7/10

Gained sudden insights about the experiences

visualextraordinary
8/10

Saw shadow beings and bright lights

shadow entity(many)
70%
DemeanorneutralCommunicationpresence onlyInteractionnone
What makes this encounter unique

The experiencer's realization of multiple dimensional beings present during a time of illness adds a unique layer to their encounter.

✦ AI-extracted phenomenological analysis — verify against source testimony
3

Experiences of abduction starting from age four, with increased frequency in adulthood.

Jocelyn Buckner · First-Person

Encounter Context

Factual Details
2013-12-01Year: 2013

near the experiencer's parents' house in the woods

ruralwoods
2 witnesses mentionedMishaJocelyn

Encounter Research Breakdown

Phenomenological Analysis
close encounterCE31 entityshadow entity
Low Evidential StrengthScore: 12/21first person
Detail & Specificity
2/3
Corroboration
1/3
Physical Evidence
1/3
Unpredictability
3/3
Perceptual Clarity
2/3
Timely Reporting
1/3
Witness Credibility
2/3

The account presents a personal experience with some details about perceived phenomena, but lacks corroboration and clear witness credibility. The narrative includes vague descriptions and subjective experiences without independent verification.

initial experienceunknown

The experiencer describes a series of events leading to a significant encounter, including a call for a UFO and a subsequent sighting of an orb.

as soon as I erased it but one time go ahead sorry one time regarding the my lab

encounter with shadow entitiesunknown

The experiencer describes waking up to see shadowy figures with large shoulders and helmets near the bed.

I'm seeing this these about five six feet tall shadow people moving in front of the bed

visualextraordinary
8/10

Saw a black disc and shadowy figures

tactile
5/10

felt drugged and disoriented

auditoryextraordinary
7/10

Heard a man crying and yelling in his head

proprioceptive
6/10

felt super drugged up

shadow entity(few)
80%
DemeanorneutralCommunicationnoneInteractionobservationHeight5-6_ft

Appearance: shadowy figures with large shoulders and helmets

Shapedisc
Sizefour inches
Colorblack
Luminositynot stated
Soundnot stated
Five Observables (0/5)
positive lift low observability hypersonic velocity trans medium travel instantaneous acceleration

The experiencer saw a small black disc hovering in the doorway.

What makes this encounter unique

The encounter involved shadow entities and a black disc, with a strong sense of fear and confusion experienced by the witness.

✦ AI-extracted phenomenological analysis — verify against source testimony
4

Experiences of abduction and military involvement, including a significant event at a conference.

Lorien Fenton · First-Person

Encounter Context

Factual Details
3 witnesses mentionedDr. Stephen GreerJacques ValetLorient

Encounter Research Breakdown

Phenomenological Analysis
abductionCE4
Low Evidential StrengthScore: 11/21first person
Detail & Specificity
1/3
Corroboration
1/3
Physical Evidence
1/3
Unpredictability
3/3
Perceptual Clarity
2/3
Timely Reporting
1/3
Witness Credibility
2/3

The account presents a personal narrative of alleged abductions and experiences but lacks specific verifiable details and corroboration. The witness discusses their experiences and opinions on military involvement in abductions, but the claims are vague and not supported by independent evidence.

initial awarenessunknown

The experiencer attempts to raise their arm and then blacks out, waking up in a hospital robe and realizing they have lost time.

as soon as i do that i black out i wake up i realize i'm i'm probably naked because i'm bare feet

return to consciousnessunknown

The experiencer wakes up the next morning, indicating a return to normal consciousness after the blackout.

i wake up the next morning

visual
5/10

Looking at their feet and noticing hospital robes

tactile
4/10

feeling of being bare feet

The analysis found no relevant content for this section.

What makes this encounter unique

The encounter involves repeated blackouts and a sense of confusion about the experiencer's state and surroundings.

✦ AI-extracted phenomenological analysis — verify against source testimony

Have you had a similar experience?

Many people have reported encounters they struggle to explain. You are not alone. Project Profound collects and analyzes these accounts to advance understanding.

Talk about it with AI →

Analysis Summary

Program Intel Profile
interviewTopic: otherIntel Value: 8/10
1

Melinda Leslie

First-Person

Contact Experience Triad

Hynek: CE4
2

Miesha Johnston

First-Person

Contact Experience Triad

Hynek: CE3
3

Jocelyn Buckner

First-Person

Contact Experience Triad

Hynek: CE3
4

Lorien Fenton

First-Person

Contact Experience Triad

Hynek: CE4
5

Unnamed Witness 1

Retold Account

This is a retold account. Triad scoring requires direct experiencer testimony.

6

Unnamed Witness 2

Retold Account

This is a retold account. Triad scoring requires direct experiencer testimony.