Yemen UAP & UFO Hearing Analysis- The GOOD The BAD & The UGLY

L
Lehto Files
·
September 12, 2025
14.2K views
Tier 1First Person EncounterInterview with Experiencer
Experiencer: Chief Wiggins, Dylan Borland, David Grush, Unnamed Witness 1

Analysis Summary

Program Intel Profile
deep dive analysisTopic: congressional hearingEra: 2020sIntel Value: 8/10

Chief Wiggins

Contact Experience Triad

Hynek: not_stated

Dylan Borland

Contact Experience Triad

David Grush

Contact Experience Triad

Hynek: CE1

Unnamed Witness 1

Contact Experience Triad

The Encounter

The speaker analyzes a recent UAP congressional hearing. They highlight strong evidence presented, especially Chief Wiggins' testimony about a Tic Tac encounter from February 2023. Wiggins described seeing lights and radar contacts, and multiple witnesses confirmed the sighting. The speaker criticizes the inclusion of a questionable video presented by Representative Berles, which they believe distracts from stronger evidence. They express concern over the treatment of UAP witnesses, noting retaliation against some. Overall, the speaker feels the hearing made progress in UAP discussions but warns against presenting weak evidence that undermines credibility.

✦ AI Generated

Program Intelligence Analysis

Executive Summary

The recent congressional UAP hearing revealed significant testimonies and evidence regarding UAP encounters, particularly the 2023 Tic Tac event. However, issues of systematic retaliation against witnesses and the lack of investigation by Arrow were highlighted as major concerns.

Primary Revelation

The 2023 Tic Tac event should be the centerpiece of UAP investigations due to its compelling evidence.

C
Chief Wiggins
military officialpro disclosure
USS Jackson
active dutyeyewitness testimonymultiple crew witnesses

This was within seven nautical miles based on the radar.

D
Dylan Borland
military officialpro disclosure
Langley
trained geospatial intelligence analystfirsthand account

He literally saw it in person.

G
George Knapp
journalistpro disclosure
not specified
long career in journalismknown for credible reporting

He had tons and pages and pages of Russian documentation.

D
David Grush
intelligence officerpro disclosure
not specified
former intelligence officerpublic testimony

I do think he made a miscalculation on this video.

R
Representative Luna
legislatorpro disclosure
Congress
elected officialbipartisan support

That was amazing.

R
Representative Berles
legislatorunknown
Congress
elected official

This is the video that Berles actually played at the hearing.

R
Representative Lee
legislatorunknown
Congress
elected official

Representative Lee just looked terrible to me.

UAP Investigation Programcurrent (not specified to not specified)disputed

Managed by: Arrow

Investigate UAP encounters

historical eventspecific

Chief Wiggins provided compelling testimony regarding a UAP encounter on February 15, 2023, involving multiple sensors and a visual sighting.

Source: Unnamed individualEvent: 2023-02-15 | Claimed: 2023-10-01
non human intelligencehighly specific

Dylan Borland witnessed a triangular craft at Langley, describing it in detail and experiencing electromagnetic interference that damaged his phone.

Source: Unnamed individualEvent: unknown | Claimed: 2023-10-01
historical eventspecific

George Knapp presented Russian documentation revealing a significant UAP investigation program by the Soviet Union, including incidents involving nuclear sites.

Source: Unnamed individualEvent: 1982-10-01 | Claimed: 2023-10-01
coverupspecific

The 2023 Tic Tac event should be the focus of UAP investigations due to its compelling evidence, yet Arrow has not investigated it.

Source: Unnamed individualEvent: 2023-02-15 | Claimed: 2023-10-01
intimidationspecific

There is a systematic retaliation against UAP witnesses, including job loss and intimidation.

Source: Unnamed individualEvent: unknown | Claimed: 2023-10-01
✦ AI-extracted program intelligence — verify against source testimony
1

Witnessed a Tic Tac UAP on the USS Jackson in 2023, with radar and visual confirmation.

Chief Wiggins · First-Person

Encounter Context

Factual Details

The analysis found no structured encounter context.

Encounter Research Breakdown

Phenomenological Analysis
not statednot_stated
Low Evidential StrengthScore: 7/21commentary
Detail & Specificity
1/3
Corroboration
1/3
Physical Evidence
1/3
Unpredictability
1/3
Perceptual Clarity
1/3
Timely Reporting
1/3
Witness Credibility
1/3

The transcript primarily consists of commentary on a UAP hearing without presenting a specific first-person account or detailed report of an encounter. The speaker discusses general observations and opinions, lacking concrete evidence or details about a specific UAP event.

The analysis found no relevant content for this section.

The analysis found no relevant content for this section.

The analysis found no relevant content for this section.

✦ AI-extracted phenomenological analysis — verify against source testimony
2

Saw a triangular craft at Langley, described it in detail and experienced electromagnetic interference.

Dylan Borland · First-Person

Encounter Context

Factual Details
2023-02-15Year: 2023

Whiskey 291

Connected Encounters (1)
USS Jackson
Military Witness
RankChief
BaseUSS Jackson
1 witness mentionedChief Wiggins

Encounter Research Breakdown

Phenomenological Analysis
encounterUnknown Classification
Low Evidential StrengthScore: 10/21commentary
Detail & Specificity
2/3
Corroboration
1/3
Physical Evidence
1/3
Unpredictability
2/3
Perceptual Clarity
1/3
Timely Reporting
1/3
Witness Credibility
2/3

The commentary discusses Chief Wiggins' testimony and a specific UAP encounter but lacks detailed first-person accounts or specific evidence from the encounter itself. The analysis is based on a general overview rather than direct witness statements.

The analysis found no relevant content for this section.

The analysis found no relevant content for this section.

The analysis found no relevant content for this section.

✦ AI-extracted phenomenological analysis — verify against source testimony
3

Testified about UAPs and was present during the discussion of a UAP video from Yemen.

David Grush · First-Person

Encounter Context

Factual Details
2004-01-01Year: 2004
Military Witness
Dutyactive duty
1 witness mentionedDavid Fraver

Encounter Research Breakdown

Phenomenological Analysis
physical sightingCE1
Low Evidential StrengthScore: 12/21commentary
Detail & Specificity
2/3
Corroboration
2/3
Physical Evidence
1/3
Unpredictability
2/3
Perceptual Clarity
2/3
Timely Reporting
1/3
Witness Credibility
2/3

The commentary discusses the Tic Tac incident and mentions credible eyewitness testimony and radar data, but lacks specific details about the witness and the encounter itself. The absence of direct first-person accounts and corroborating evidence limits the overall evidential strength.

initial sightingunknown

The encounter began with radar detection of a UAP, leading to visual confirmation by witnesses.

They saw it on the radar. That's what queued them off in the first place.

witness engagementunknown

Witnesses observed the UAP visually and through FLIR video, confirming its presence.

We had this amazing fleer video where it looks just like a tic tac.

visual
7/10

Witnesses saw lights and the UAP visually.

The analysis found no relevant content for this section.

Shapetic tac
Sizeunknown
Luminositynot stated
Soundnot stated
Five Observables (0/5)
positive lift low observability hypersonic velocity trans medium travel instantaneous acceleration

Witnesses observed a UAP resembling a Tic Tac, confirmed through radar and visual sightings.

What makes this encounter unique

This encounter is notable for being the first active duty witness testimony regarding UAPs, supported by radar and video evidence.

✦ AI-extracted phenomenological analysis — verify against source testimony
4

Witnessed intimidation and retaliation against UAP witnesses.

Unnamed Witness 1 · Interview

Encounter Context

Factual Details
Connected Events
2023 Tic Tac2023

Encounter Research Breakdown

Phenomenological Analysis
encounterUnknown Classification
Low Evidential StrengthScore: 7/21commentary
Detail & Specificity
1/3
Corroboration
1/3
Physical Evidence
1/3
Unpredictability
1/3
Perceptual Clarity
1/3
Timely Reporting
1/3
Witness Credibility
1/3

The speaker discusses the need for better evidence standards in UAP cases but does not provide a specific first-person account of an encounter. The references to cases like the 2023 Tic Tac are general and lack detailed specifics, leading to a low score.

The analysis found no relevant content for this section.

The analysis found no relevant content for this section.

The analysis found no relevant content for this section.

✦ AI-extracted phenomenological analysis — verify against source testimony

Have you had a similar experience?

Many people have reported encounters they struggle to explain. You are not alone. Project Profound collects and analyzes these accounts to advance understanding.

Talk about it with AI →

Analysis Summary

Program Intel Profile
deep dive analysisTopic: congressional hearingEra: 2020sIntel Value: 8/10
1

Chief Wiggins

First-Person

Contact Experience Triad

Hynek: not_stated
2

Dylan Borland

First-Person

Contact Experience Triad

3

David Grush

First-Person

Contact Experience Triad

Hynek: CE1
4

Unnamed Witness 1

Interview

Contact Experience Triad