A New Investigation Into 9/11 With Richard Gage
Analysis Summary
Summary
Richard Gage is an architect from the San Francisco Bay Area. He discusses the collapse of World Trade Center Building 7 during a presentation. Gage states that the building fell about seven hours after the Twin Towers. He claims it was not hit by a plane and questions the official explanation that fire caused the collapse. He presents evidence suggesting the building's fall resembled a controlled demolition. Gage mentions witness accounts of explosions and predictions of the building's collapse before it happened. He expresses frustration that many architects and engineers are unaware of the details surrounding this event. After the encounter, Gage feels a strong desire to share his findings and advocate for a new investigation into the collapse.
Program Intelligence Analysis
Richard Gage discusses the controversial collapse of World Trade Center 7, arguing that it was a controlled demolition rather than a result of fire. He presents witness testimonies and critiques the official NIST report, claiming it lacks scientific validity.
The collapse of World Trade Center 7 was due to controlled demolition, not fire.
Richard Gage
“It takes a lot of courage to even be willing to look at this stuff.”
Managed by: National Institute of Standards and Technology
To investigate the causes of the collapse of the World Trade Center buildings
The collapse of World Trade Center 7 was due to controlled demolition, not fire.
Witnesses reported hearing explosions before the collapse of WTC 7.
The official narrative by NIST regarding the collapse of WTC 7 is flawed and lacks scientific basis.